veebee

On the first one, if I provide the following data objects (each of which constituting a data group), I would expect to get 4 evidence records in return: "hello", "world",...

@raubv0gel, my understanding is that the RHT is data-group dependent (cf. Figures 2 and 3 under section 4.2). As there is only a single RHT under and ArchiveTimeStamp, an ER...

> Actually, one have to generate a reduced hash tree of each data object. That's my point actually, and the reason why my understanding of the RFC is that one...

> That said there is nothing to stop you from producing an ER per document, but you wouldn't use a reduced hash tree for this as it makes no sense...

> **Hence, I guess @veebee was/is absolutely right!** Of course, I'm always right :-) Anyways, if needed I'd be happy to rework on the implementation I made a while ago.

> @veebee, did you find the conversation with T. Gondrom? Does it clarify if an ArchiveTimeStamp is used for a single data or for all data? Maybe, I can try...

> I think we need to reset this. > > @veebee you are trying to say that the scenario described in Section 4.2 should produce 3 evidence records. Is that...

Finally found back some test data from BSI, in case you're interested. Apologies for the time it took... [20170316_Testdaten 2.zip](https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/files/9573698/20170316_Testdaten.2.zip)