Bandhav Veluri

@nate-wandb I see the same issue, `--no-include-synced --mark-synced` has no effect. The following snip shows that an already synced is being synced again... ...

Hi @nate-wandb, I see `wandb: ERROR Nothing to sync.` if do not use wildcards and use `--sync-all` flag instead. ``` $ wandb sync --no-include-synced --sync-all --mark-synced runs/ wandb: ERROR Nothing...

Hi @nate-wandb, I'm not aware of a good way to ascertain this. Maybe a more informed message would help? With the info on the no. of synced runs, unsynced runs...

Hi @nate-wandb, sorry for the ambiguity there. Here's the clear output: ``` (ts-hear) bandhav@klone-login01:~/uwx/ts-hear$ ls runs/waveformer_1ch_384_5e4_chunk_37/wandb | grep offline-run offline-run-20230718_072501-m63i9ddr offline-run-20230718_114939-1t0n1y2e offline-run-20230718_150206-5x6jgxrg offline-run-20230718_172828-9k8cxkbp offline-run-20230718_195353-r99zb3ra offline-run-20230719_024821-ypphzg18 offline-run-20230719_072155-j70mdltg offline-run-20230719_115018-yxn0ma2f offline-run-20230719_162215-4zkl1prq offline-run-20230719_205105-avw53wmv offline-run-20230720_050420-gyrpbesj...

Hi @nate-wandb, found the run that's not synced (`offline-run-20230721_141743-ag1nm9tx`)... it did have `*.wandb` file but no `*.wandb.synced` file. I can email you the run if that helps.

Hi @nate-wandb, yes, the run might have been killed. I don't remember how... could have been by Slurm, or by me manually. If it's empty, shouldn't it just be marked...

Hi @nate-wandb, a feature request sounds good to me. Thank you!

Thank you for this change as well @aniketmaurya! To understand more, which `app.py` version is used by the lightning app linked in the README? The version that Github server has,...

@aniketmaurya, the app is fantastic! But to make sure this repository is simple and focused on the model development/evaluation, I feel it's best to separate out the application implementation. We...

Definitely, that sounds great!