Piers Chambers

I think this is a reasonable customization for users to make if they want and expect this behavior. Feel free to submit as a pull and we'll see if it...

Are you sure this is ActiveAdmin specific? See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8997226/rake-assetsprecompile-attempting-to-connect-to-database and http://blog.zeit.io/use-a-fake-db-adapter-to-play-nice-with-rails-assets-precompilation/

@Fire-Dragon-DoL Your [wish is granted](https://github.com/activeadmin/inherited_resources/pull/420/commits/849eecd13dd699c2528878165b87b992fc083b88) For the curious, I believe inherited_resources was the inspiration and heart of ActiveAdmin, see Greg's [original repo](https://github.com/gregbell/inherited_views)

@timoschilling Can we close for now? If someone has a PR to remove in future then great, but you already know how difficult that is.

Take a look at a resposive [theme](https://github.com/activeadmin/activeadmin/wiki/Themes) like ArcticAdmin.

Isn't this a [Formtastic issue](https://github.com/justinfrench/formtastic/issues)?

The first test looks fine: congrats, you are over half way to submitting a PR!

I clarified my original suggestion above. A test in `action_items_spec` would be nice to have, but the only similar test I see where `authorized?` is stubbed false is in `auto_link_spec.rb`...

See #5048

@senid231 Don't do that. :scream: Try the Arbre way: ```ruby class StaticPieChart < Arbre::Component builder_method :static_pie_chart def default_class_name 'd3-pie-chart' end def buid(data, attributes = {}) super attributes.merge('data-series': data) end end...