Juri Hahn

@nakabonne If you look at the 2nd example this is exactly what I did! > docker run --rm -it -v $(pwd)/hosts:/etc/hosts nakabonne/ali ali example.com The only difference is that I...

@Merovex Thanks for this. Indeed, I think something like that could be nice default. Though, I’d like to challenge the following assumption: > There's no need to create several view...

@thejbix This has been address in the following PR: https://github.com/public-activity/public_activity/pull/154. However, that PR needs work, i.e. rebasing. I haven’t had the time myself yet but feel free to take a...

@aquadrehz Could you elaborate a little more how it helped you?

@aquadrehz Allow me to rephrase my question: how did it help you to solve your problem? What information does the exception carry that helped you resolve your issue? I’m not...

@smridge I’m in 2 minds about this change. I totally get your point about changing `config.active_record.belongs_to_required_by_default = false|true` potentially having a huge impact as you described. In the upgrade scenario,...

@smridge > I do strongly feel the gem should provide explicit intent, optional: true or optional: false - which one is it? Neither. The 3rd option is “depending on your...

@ronakabhattrz @tmyengstrom Do either of you have a code snippet or even better demo app to reproduce the issue?

@prvinuch As this issue is close to 1 year old, have you managed to resolve your issue? If not, could you try [v2.0.0](https://github.com/public-activity/public_activity/tree/v2.0.0)?

@aquadrehz Sorry for the late reply. Could you please elaborate on the following: > If not use this gem the exception would be obvious and failed tom start to app...