David Jones

@hesham Thanks for documenting this issue! Saved me a ton of frustration.

Could you please post the results of running `wkhtmltopdf --version` for both the system binary and the one from this project? One difference I could see is that system binaries...

@daniellytle It seems this is failing in CI trying to run an older version on linux systems: ``` 1) Failure: WithDockerTest#test_debian_11 [/home/runner/work/wkhtmltopdf_binary_gem/wkhtmltopdf_binary_gem/test/test_with_docker.rb:63]: --- expected +++ actual @@ -1 +1 @@...

This is very likely due to your setup with wicked_pdf and where the asset is located, and not wkhtmltopdf_binary_gem. There are many reasons this could be happening for you. 1....

1-3. If the output of `image_url(@image_url)` is a fully-qualified URL with protocol and host, then you don't need `wicked_pdf_image_tag`, and can use just `image_tag`. 4. You'll still want to set...

@k3rni I've merged PR #49, and the built gem for that is around 250mb (instead of 171 as claimed here, but probably because it's changed since you looked). I'd love...

Reopening because I think we want to do this. I've had a number of reports from people having trouble uncompressing the gzipped files, especially on systems with restricted filesystems.

@anatoliliotych How did you get the binary file to include in this PR? I downloaded the official packages from https://wkhtmltopdf.org/downloads.html for Ubuntu 22.04 (both jammy and focal), and neither one...

@anatoliliotych Would you mind terribly replacing the binary with the most recent one? I'd be happy to merge and release with that.

@anatoliliotych Thanks! Have you verified that this works on your Ubuntu 22 system yet?