Richard Threlkeld
Richard Threlkeld
@isocra if you require offline per the comments above and the documentation you can use 2.4.6 with the standard client and don't need a link.
Hello everyone - I want to reply and assure you that we have not abandoned support of this project. Per my earlier comment, this is a complex process and to...
> Thanks for giving us updates on this @undefobj . > For offline support, what about the solution of @doldyn ? The problem is query manager uses some private methods,...
> @undefobj , > In the aws-appsync code there is also another link added when constructing the client: > ` new link_1.ComplexObjectLink(complexObjectsCredentials)` > When I saw it, I guessed that...
@sakhmedbayev I can't see why it wouldn't, nothing specific here is different with a static build. What I have seen in the past is that when people host apps and...
> [This solution](https://github.com/awslabs/aws-mobile-appsync-sdk-js#using-authorization-and-subscription-links-with-apollo-client-no-offline-support) doesn't seem to work with any other auth strategy other than API Key. We've tested with React apps, however maybe this could be something with SSR. That's...
Hi can you let us know what the issue is? This example is for web only whereas the React Native sample should run with Expo.
> @undefobj do you have an update? No update on this. It is something we're looking into, but local encryption that is still query-able with key management to devices for...
@lawmicha Not sure I understand this issue on a couple fronts. First, why are we using Cognito with OIDC settings? The standard Cognito User Pools auth does this behind the...
This is being tracked internally across platforms for standardized error handling and not swallowing service errors that conflict with the clients. @HuiSF please connect with PMs and SDMs on this...