Daniel Huigens
Daniel Huigens
Hi :wave: As I've written in https://github.com/w3c/webcrypto/issues/265#issuecomment-849826429, I definitely agree. It's unfortunate that, if developers are going by what's available in Web Crypto, that they're led to choose PBKDF2, so...
Great, thanks! Transfer requested :)
:tada: Thanks! Could you update the URL in the "About" section of the repo to https://wicg.github.io/webcrypto-secure-curves/, or give me access to do so, by any chance?
:pray: Thanks!
Hey :wave: The reason it's in WICG is because [the new WebAppSec charter](https://www.w3.org/2022/06/webappsec-charter-2022.html) says that > The WG may adopt well-supported proposals from incubation for maintenance of the Web Cryptography...
> If you need a WebKit view on this (it's ok for the requests to be about issues, not necessarily just whole specs) please file a separate standards-positions issue so...
Hi there, I've passed it on internally. I don't think anyone at Proton is a huge fan of the current solution, either :)
Hey :wave: Apologies for the delayed response. I think the new (non-tentative) tests are correct in that they match the spec, however, for ECDH and X25519, I'm not 100% sure...
Yeah, I understand. I'm also not really worried about adding tests for X25519 (tentative or otherwise) that need to be changed later, but I'm more hesitant about doing that for...
Right. Yeah, I don't think there's full agreement on that yet either, as e.g. we have this open PR too: https://github.com/w3c/webcrypto/pull/351. (Which, if we merge something like that, we should...