tuxmainy
tuxmainy
Hi, > Shouldn't this be handled by the IDP? Nope, the IDP authenticates you and gives informations (like groups) to the SP. The SP itself has to decide. I think...
> Yup. in NC28 I also stillllll see this problem. But at least in NC28 you can see that the error still exists as there is no a warning in...
I got stuck at 3.4.2. Looks like this is the latest version Ubuntu 22.04 distributes via normal packages. I guess you might get newer versions when using snap or flatpack...
> Is anyone able to reproduce this behavior in combination with Desktop >= v3.10.2? Still having an eye on this. > > But can we please keep in mind that...
> Is anyone able to reproduce this behavior in combination with Desktop >= v3.10.2? The `Unknown error while seeking content` errors are gone. There are lot of other error messages...
Yeah, can confirm the behavior which I also would consider being a bug. Especially as there is an older bug (https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/issues/4715)
Confirmed. I deleted a github fork and then tried to remove the repository in woodpecker: ```json {"level":"error","error":"Error #01: GET https://api.github.com/repos/tuxmainy/ti-monitoring/hooks: 404 Not Found []\n","ip":"I USE IPv6","latency":182.020017,"method":"DELETE","path":"/api/repos/8","status":500,"time":"2025-11-02T12:29:24Z","user-agent":"Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:144.0)...
[this method fails](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/blob/352ebff4e250f498ee225c6a5eaf550c230cd571/server/forge/github/github.go#L370) One has to check every forge to fix this. Maybe there is a more generic approach? Like calling `Repos()` before in [DeleteRepo](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/blob/352ebff4e250f498ee225c6a5eaf550c230cd571/server/api/repo.go#L450) and check if the repository...
> For consistency reasons, it would be nice to have this for all forges and not just github. Can you try to check it out as fas as possible? If...
Maybe just listing all repos and check for the one you want to delete prior actual deleting? But this might give problems if somehow just the visibility is lost. Edit:...