Martin Turon

> * [x] Privacy nonce computation is not spec compliant. It also does not have a test. Fixed > * [x] GroupKeyContext::PrivacyEncrypt should be GroupKeyContext::PrivacyObfuscate We discussed this here, and...

I'm using gcc 5.4.0 with `-Werror -std=c99 -pedantic-errors`. I'm seeing warnings as errors, ISO C99 issues, and pedantic errors in nimble preventing integration with these compiler flags. ``` $ gcc...

@ccollins476ad I can look into pushing the project I'm integrating into up to `-std=c11`, but what are your thoughts on being able to pass `-Werror` and `-pedantic-errors`?

It is BSD license. Sorry I haven't made that clear in the source yet. Martin On Aug 17, 2011, at 7:58 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Hi! > > I've found...

> This has wire format changes not tested in SVE/SVE2, and not covered by test plans. The PR includes tests. SVE and SVE2 had broken behavior with regard to privacy...

> This should be discussed, as we can’t break compatibility with what has shipped UPDATE: #22425 was in fact cherry-picked to the SVE2 branch on 9/8. SVE2 ended 9/28, and...

- [ ] [Improve documentation of Privacy KDF parameters](https://github.com/CHIP-Specifications/connectedhomeip-spec/pull/5441#discussion_r921450272)

Capturing summary of initial CI failures here: ``` [IM Unit Tests] ../src/controller/tests/data_model/TestRead.cpp:1736: assertion failed: "numSuccessCalls == (app::InteractionModelEngine::kReadHandlerPoolSize + 1)" ../src/controller/tests/data_model/TestRead.cpp:1737: assertion failed: "numSubscriptionEstablishedCalls == (app::InteractionModelEngine::kReadHandlerPoolSize + 1)" ../src/controller/tests/data_model/TestRead.cpp:1738: assertion failed:...

Deprecated by #23344

Agreed. It seems very reasonable to call `mExchangeCtxt->SetResponseTimeout` on each message with an appropriate timeout for that message. Perhaps we can bucket the messages into two or three categories of...