Tom Gillam

I'm also wondering about how (if at all) the native `Timestamp` logic interacts with any of this. For example here: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/52bfe1f72fa72b0b2d150efeeeb9edacd853f96f/src/metadata/Schema.jl#L319-L336 I _think_ (based on #303 ) that native-arrow-time-with-timezone should...

The relevant sections of code are: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/532b89b2c5740124cadca632a14ebb6cc9a0dca5/src/eltypes.jl#L273-L274 and https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/532b89b2c5740124cadca632a14ebb6cc9a0dca5/src/eltypes.jl#L263-L266 which indeed show that we're currently using an `Arrow.Timestamp` object with _local_ time since the epoch and the timezone. This is...

This would be useful! As a workaround, I'm now using the following shameful hack with IJulia 1.23.2: ```julia using IJulia jupyter = IJulia.find_jupyter_subcommand("")[1] run(`$(jupyter) notebook list`) ```

I can't reproduce this on Julia 1.7.2, LibPQ 1.13.0 . Running on MacOS 12.4 under Rosetta. This is the code I've run - I'm using a data-generating query instead of...

@nickrobinson251 I have rebased this PR on the latest `main` - so should be good for a test run & hopefully merging now.

We should definitely do this. I think that doing #34 will be dependent on doing this (and associated test refactoring) first. My rough takeaways from our meeting: * We should...

Thanks for reaching out! Definitely I agree that being able to use Dagger as an evaluation scheduler for TimeDag would be great. My thought a little while ago was that,...

Thanks for this - wasn't aware of `Dagger.@mutable`! Also my simple tests were certainly only done with the most naive implementation. One (hopefully useful) observation of your current implementation is...

Just ran into the same thing while prototyping a new jll. I also have the same https -> ssh `insteadOf` override in my `.gitconfig`. I can temporarily comment out the...

Could this be the cause of #3561 too maybe?