tloka

Thanks for your answer. I am aware of the one line using the char representation, and I use it for nucleotide alphabets (where it makes sense, and is easily understandable)....

Hey @marehr, thanks **a lot** for this very detailed (!) explanation and the reasons for this design decision. I was indeed not aware that the rank is not the same...

ok, I think you are right, and what I would be looking for is simply not possible. I thought that auto deduction might work in the cases above, but you...

> > > > In every case, it would be helpful to have examples for `seqan3::assign_phred_to(some_phred_type{}, 37)}` etc. in the snippets for initialization of quality types (at least, I didn't...

> I think we should check if we can link `assign_phred_to` to the quality alphabets and then have snippets in the respective quality alphabets. Otherwise, since `assign_phred_to` is a free...

Yeah, just to sum it up and sort it a bit from my side: - My initial question is answered. I initially just asked this because I didn't see a...

Hey Marcel, thanks for your response! I think the first solution is actually catching my case, I wasn't aware that I can push records with a different set of specified...

Hey, thanks again for your answer, it compiled and worked as you proposed. However, especially when working with views / ranges to sequences, it is not trivial to declare the...

> The bottom-line is that in any case we should write a valid empty header at deconstruction if no records were provided. I agree. For the rest, I am actually...

Great to see this resolved, really appreciate it!