Tim Usner

Hm, I don't think that one comes with the other. The scheduler for instance was changed to use the Controller-Runtime but the endpoints are still served via http only. Even...

Thanks a lot @timebertt for outlining the options. I personally prefer **b)** because it additionally delivers RBAC capabilities. The disadvantage I see is yet another vertically scaled side-car and I...

I kind of agree here, even though I'm a bit more concerned that we don't have authorization for `/debug` which is however disabled by default. Any strong concerns from your...

/assign

> machine-controller-provider-local and provider-local node image are already multi-arch builds Nice. Then we need support for MCM https://github.com/gardener/gardener/blob/9535a6c27e1f6313c80279346ad8673ca69f6dc0/pkg/provider-local/imagevector/images.yaml#L2-L5

I really like the approach 👍 > introduce new provider-specific error code mappings in extensions > introduce new gardenlet-specific error code mapping and apply it to relevant tasks Does it...

My impression is that many if not all codes that we have today are very generic, match nearly all providers and cover many use-cases. In general, I wonder why a...

/cc @MartinWeindel @mandelsoft @rfranzke

@rfranzke the point about "advanced" configuration (2nd point in list) is a little bit different from what you proposed [here](https://github.com/gardener/gardener/pull/5207#issuecomment-999573417). Any strong objections to not add a RawExtension field to...

This looks like the right target picture for me as well. There is rather the challenge how to get there in a full backwards-compatible way, i.e. people can still configure...