Tim Shannon

Failing on my 64 bit linux box as well. ``` tshannon@Gaidin:~/workspace/go/src/github.com/DamnWidget/cbor$ go test -v -race -cpu 5 -test.run=TestDecodeEpochDate === RUN TestDecodeEpochDateTime-5 --- FAIL: TestDecodeEpochDateTime-5 (0.00s) common_test.go:34: TestTake: expected 18, got...

Yeah I'm seeing the same. It looks to be a focusing issue with splits. If you open up a vsplit and scroll up and down on the right split, it'll...

Nope, that's the one I was on and had the behavior described above.

Yeah, that's currently not supported. The index system is very simple in that the index is just array of byte / keys. If the underlying storage structure of the indexes...

That's what the `Reverse` method does. `Where("field").Eq(value).SortBy("field").Reverse()` I'm glad you think badgerhold is awesome.

Apologies, I didn't' read the issue close enough. You're correct. Having multiple independent sorting per field isn't really doable currently. Thanks for reporting.

Yeah this is a definite issue. See https://github.com/timshannon/bolthold/issues/105 in bolthold. My plan there was to use paging similar to how SQL Server does it, but that might be more complicated...

My plan was for all new indexes to use the new format, and for any existing indexes to use the old method. I was going to prefix the byte values...

You can just get every key from the old DB and put them into the new one. Everything badgerhold uses (indexes, type info, etc), is stored in the database.

Changing the shape of the structure ( adding or removing fields) will entirely depend on the encoding type used and how that encoding type will handle the change. On Sat,...