Till Hoffmann

I've been using the following post-processing step to get around the problem: `make_paths_relative.py < requirements.txt` (script below) ```python #!/usr/bin/env python import os import re import sys pattern = re.compile(r"\s*-e\s+file://(?P.*?)\n") inputs...

The load balanced view seems to also struggle with large input arguments in terms of performance: ```python import ipyparallel client = ipyparallel.Client() lview = client.load_balanced_view() dview = client[:] def execute(view,...

Hi Michael, apologies for the slow reply. The project is relatively inactive because we haven't had any immediate needs to update it. However, if you have specific ideas, contributions and...

It should be relatively straightforward to support http wait strategies using a generalisation of [`wait_for_logs`](https://github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-python/blob/da4dcc48f78b7e373cc7960b2e6e2451b5944e40/testcontainers/core/waiting_utils.py#L61). PRs welcome!

@Can-Sahin, makes sense to want to keep the container alive to speed up tests. Having said that, I'm not sure how you'd be able to connect to the existing container...

Closing this one for now but feel free to reopen if using fixtures with a different scope cannot address the problem.

Sounds like there is sufficiently broad interest in this feature. We could add a `remove: bool = True` keyword argument to the constructor and keep the container alive if `not...

@smparekh, I don't have the privileges to restart a build, unfortunately. Force-pushing may retrigger the build, however.

Sorry, I dropped the ball on this. I think we just need a few small changes to resolve the merge conflicts and align tests with the structure described [here](https://github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-python#contributing-a-new-container).

Happy to switch to poetry. But let's keep the update process manual--changing dependencies should be a conscious choice. Are you happy to contribute a PR? Does poetry support lock files...