Thomas Parrish
Thomas Parrish
> we can fix that :) Are there still plans to implement this?
We're also having this issue since Upgrading. I can confirm that the issue was introduced in 17.4.0, and did not exist in 17.3.1.
> I'll see if I can replicate with generic code, but that may take some time. I can tell you that the failing code looks like this: ``` var results...
> any update on that repro. i would really like to fix this bug, but not being able to reproduce it is a blocker I haven't been able to produce...
> @thomas-parrish can u debug into Verify to see where the recursion is? This is the call stack when the exception is thrown: ``` System.Private.CoreLib.dll!System.RuntimeTypeHandle.GetGenericTypeDefinition(System.RuntimeType type) Line 550 C# System.Private.CoreLib.dll!System.RuntimeType.GetGenericTypeDefinition()...
> can u try version 18.0.0-beta.3 Very sorry for the delay, I was absolutely hammered last week and couldn't find time to dig in (oddly enough, I tried almost the...
I would second this feature, and I would argue it's a more common use-case than a fixed date range is. An easy start that would get us halfway there would...
Why hasn't this been accepted yet?
> But that's just a hack, it's not a solution. I should not have to add anything to a non-routable component to make it work. It's also a violation of...
How has this not been addressed yet? Just create a Patreon like Adam if you're that hard pressed for revenue.