Ryan Foster

> However, we then have to resolve the type again... all we have are the abstract type (`Node`) and the implementation object (`Foo`) I think I'm a little fuzzy on...

I think what confuses me is that here, after the `resolve_type` call, the concrete type is preserved in that the object is wrapped in it:  I think you're saying...

Ooooh 🤦‍♂️ I'm sorry, I understand what you're saying now. You'd like the field-level resolver (for the `node` field in this case) to be able to return an object, and...