the-frey
the-frey
~Quick CI question 1: why remove gosec?~ because it's part of codeql, cool CI looks like it's failing because of a regression or change that means the contracts can't be...
Cool, will look at that today 👍
Yeah, I guess my thinking here was: - finish integrating - work out some way of testing this on uni-3 and/or using strangelove's amazing IBC-a-tron - change it if we...
I think it's likely there will be another version of intertx we will need to upgrade to... but hey, should be enough to test for now.
Yeah, that's my understanding. Hence why I suspect it might: a) fall over in the wild b) have a series of changes as people find issues So we will likely...
Ah, I think you're right. I guess we also need to add some wasm message types into that registration block. Will look at it in a sec.
Question: do we want to allow ICA to access all wasm message types? In the absence of a firm feeling, I added the available ones but there might be a...
Also @joeabbey there's also the question of whether we go with just the first half of this (i.e. Host implementation) first, so we don't have to worry about the auth...
So - proposal here @joeabbey and @faddat is to park this branch for now and just integrate the ICA host portion (i.e. the very first couple of commits), _with_ the...
Have also converted to draft while we discuss.