Tony Knapp

Results 9 comments of Tony Knapp

In reply to the original comment, I found I was able to get the original model by going to `model_multi_gpu.layers[-2]`. That would return a `keras.models.Sequential` or `keras.models.Model` object that I...

Update: The AWS Database Encryption SDK for DynamoDB in Java has GA-ed! @debora-ito I believe this issue can be closed.

@EvgenyKislyy Thanks for cutting the issue. The Amazon S3 Encryption Client (S3EC) always uses an Async client to for [Get](https://github.com/aws/amazon-s3-encryption-client-java/blob/45b69fb1f2716f6cf2d114e1b6383670607580a1/src/main/java/software/amazon/encryption/s3/S3EncryptionClient.java#L243-L249) or [Put object](https://github.com/aws/amazon-s3-encryption-client-java/blob/45b69fb1f2716f6cf2d114e1b6383670607580a1/src/main/java/software/amazon/encryption/s3/S3EncryptionClient.java#L189-L210). It appears you have found a bug,...

@EvgenyKislyy Alas, the AWS S3 Encryption Client V3 (S3EC) does not support reading plaintext objects. A normal S3 Client MUST be used to read plaintext objects. I will cut a...

A work-around: Open the Z3 binary via Finder with right click Open. A prompt will appear, suggesting you forbid, but allowing you to permit Z3 to run. For me: ```...

> @dependabot recreate This is not a debpendabot branch, so I do not think its commands will work here...

Side Note: I have no idea why the CRT tests are taking so long... CI this morning took 8 minutes: https://github.com/aws/amazon-s3-encryption-client-java/actions/runs/9647714113/job/26607177101. But every test run I have started has timed...

@NathanEckert Thank you for cutting the issue. I ran your code; I cannot get your results. [Glance at the comments I put in this commit](https://github.com/aws/amazon-s3-encryption-client-java/commit/6facc438caa9b7570e3dc39c5295d05632fb8078). I had a hard time...

@NathanEckert thank you for that reproduction. We probably were hitting your error, but the log statement was not emitting. I have created a branch with a GitHub workflow explicitly for...