Tom Gundersen

Fixed request: ``` { "customizations": { "packages": [ "osbuild-composer-worker-config" ], "payload_repositories": [ { "baseurl": "https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/packit/osbuild-osbuild-composer-2838/epel-8-x86_64/", "rhsm": false }, { "baseurl": "https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/8/Everything/x86_64/", "rhsm": false }, { "baseurl": "https://repositories.timber.io/public/vector/rpm/el/8/noarch/", "rhsm": false },...

Sounds not unreasonable to me, as long as these things are somehow content addressable (such as installed from a git repository). Could you elaborate on your use-case?

Thank you for this! A few notes: - To @thozza's comment, I think it makes sense to allow future minor versions, under the assumption that they remain backwards compatible. We...

@jkozol do we still list all packages in the new UI, or is it all search based now? If we do list them, the additional speedup possibility I had in...

Another idea, I don't know why we never did this: Could we add a call to just download metadata for a repo? On start (or repo add), we could download...

Thanks for the explanation, that all makes sense to me!

I ran into this when trying to use image builder to build our worker images from the RPMs in COPR. I ended up with RPMs from AppStream, which is not...

The alternative approach is to set the priority by "group of repositories", and then keep it the same for the whole group, there could be that BaseOS and AppStream having...

I agree to both comments. I might not get the chance to finish this up, so please consider it a glorified RFE, and feel free to take it over :)

Regarding replacing base packages. I think we have the following scenarios (and I think @ondrejbudai might be looking into clarifying this): - user wants to add software to a RHEL...