tamagosante
tamagosante
@lja1018 Hey there, could you share the current state of this feature request? We would be really interested in this feature, so +1
A simple method call instead of all the custom syntax seems actually desirable. +1
My issue with the initial proposal: - when there are more attributes, could quickly get out of hand on what belongs where (as you mentioned) - too many `?` operators?...
> close to switch/case Yeah true. Now, I can better see what your initial proposal tried to solve. ### Next idea #### "Local templates" - Magic Inspired by "[Local templates](https://docs.aurelia.io/getting-to-know-aurelia/introduction/local-templates)"...
Re: Current docs about ["File systems and IPFS"](https://docs.ipfs.io/concepts/ipfs-gateway/#overview): MFS and UnixFS My profile: Someone new to web3 and IPFs ### Reading the docs The docs are doing a good job...
Thanks for reporting. This is the second request for OpenVSX already. Unfortunately, I can already they, that this is lower prio right now. Just because it involves another platform and...
Maybe, I can add an issue, where I post .vsix updates for subscription purposes, would that work @0xEAB?
@mroeling Thanks for suggesting. I tried to address this issue in https://github.com/MaximBalaganskiy/aurelia-inspector/pull/1 Limitation Real time value update don't work here, since we just map the Map values to an tuple...
Hi @jbockle, ty for trying out the `smartAutocomplete` feature. I definitely need to put up a detailed readme on the limitations of the extension. Unfortunately, I have no experience with...
Hey, can you check out this [wiki article](https://github.com/aurelia/vscode-extension/wiki/View-Autocomplete#parsing-components) and see if the following setting helps with the monorepo setup? ``` "aurelia.extensionSettings": { "pathToAureliaProject": [ "src", // this is the default...