syb0rg
syb0rg
> it's not atomic Can you explain what you would like atomic better? > your changes are questionable (like, you changed `int64_t` to `int`) It was necessary to get the...
> Atomic changes are easier to review because there's no need to switch contexts. Contexts? This isn't a C concept as far as I know, can you be more explicit?...
> Although I'd still wait nshmyrev to accept your ideas before starting to write the code The build system is already been written, and my code that uses that build...