Imri Paran

this is still relevant. if the MSI is not supported anymore it can at very least be removed from the README

I followed the suggestion by @Montagon and it worked like charm on `3.4.0`. > Hi all, > > In my case, it worked adding using the same approach that in...

## Using `anyOf` in OM jsonschemas We might be abusing jsonschema's ability to express validation when in fact, in OM, it is used for code generation. So although jsonschema supports...

@IceS2 please approve again. had to fix one of the tests with this change.

@IceS2 resolved conflicts. please re-approve.

anybody know why `py_format_check` is failing for files I have not changed? ```python ingestion/src/metadata/great_expectations/action.py:110:4: W0237: Parameter 'expectation_suite_identifier' has been renamed to 'payload' in overriding 'OpenMetadataValidationAction._run' method (arguments-renamed) ingestion/src/metadata/great_expectations/action.py:110:4: W0237: Parameter...

> > ```python > > OpenMetadataValidationAction > > ``` > > You should check the parent method signature (it looks like some parameters do not use the same name in...

> re: https://github.com/open-metadata/OpenMetadata/pull/15189#issuecomment-1946162835 It appears `gx` have the same issue with their linter. I will add an ignore comment like they did... https://github.com/great-expectations/great_expectations/blame/0.18.8/great_expectations/checkpoint/actions.py#L374C16-L374C83

@TeddyCr thanks. Should I take any action on [this discussion](https://github.com/open-metadata/OpenMetadata/pull/15189#discussion_r1491074878) or are we good?

requires https://github.com/open-metadata/OpenMetadata/issues/9686