stevenebutler

FYI, pull request #174 removes the need to hard-code the web port based on a suggestion in issue #171

> @stevenebutler could you help me resolve this merge conflict? I have merged your changes with master and created a PR on your repository. IWR/IRM tests are passing locally for...

> > @CarloToso The CIs are failing due to a compilation error. Can you please fix it? > > There were some extensive changes in #19558, @stevenebutler could you help...

> > > @CarloToso The CIs are failing due to a compilation error. Can you please fix it? > > > > > > There were some extensive changes in...

That is the server side listener not the client side http handler. There are more timeouts available on socket http handler class but PowerShell is not using that class -...

You could also be uploading/downloading data you have no intention of storing in a file so I'm not sure it's as clear cut as having two options and an easy,...

@iSazonov - so what you're saying is the timeout should only ever mean "length of time between received data chunks/packets/whatever" has been exceeded, and should in no way apply to...

From the WG notes they suggested defaulting to not have any timeout which is leaving the default situation where it will hang until someone CTRL-C the download if the OS...

PR above adds the feature as per the discussion here, and with the timeout defaulting to disabled. If WG wants to change the default that will be trivial to do.

> @stevenebutler could you help me with the failing test? With the change made I would expect the test to fail. The test is ensuring that supplying the Proxy parameter...