Jeremy Pallats/starcraft.man
Jeremy Pallats/starcraft.man
I look forward to all passing build. Will have to review using my rudimentary knowledge of Haskell. Question: I noticed we have several lts resolver's named for testing in Travis....
Excellent, faster always better. Thanks again for working on the patch. Once merged I'll update our main fork issue and title. Sure to be welcome news to the Haskell users...
Good point regarding matrix. Quite handy having everything specified and isolated to within the project. Thankfully for python almost any recent python (except 3.1) should work. I had a quick...
I took this for a spin and found a few small issues and my comments follow. Overall I'm really happy, thanks again for doing this. To test the branch I...
@madnight My bad on bug 2, apparently way back during my changes I pulled an order change on the `zshrc.sh` and pushed it down to `gitstatus.py`. You don't have to...
That seems like a great idea for testing. The only downside is that this kind of test framework won't integrate with the langauge and give us a line hit/miss count...
@madnight That's fine by me if you'd like that. I don't think it a large deal, will be pretty clear when Haskell or other being worked on. How goes the...
@madnight Just a note, I've completed rewriting my functional tests from py.test to bats. Just wanted to let you know so no effort wasted. I've pasted the file below if...
Yeah, I think we've officially crammed enough into this one PR. Mark it as skip for now and we'll review that later. The remote gone test is also skipped at...
Ok, I'll review this and merge unless I find anything else.