Shawn Garbett
Shawn Garbett
Looks like most of the changes are dropped features. I would posit that most of the upgrade would be just dropping some tokens from the parse tree. Or course, I've...
Possibly related to #224
Why would such a behavior be desirable? Is this a way to get 1.2 support?
The current issue with this is that the current version of libyaml has a patch for indentation that doesn't not exist upstream. Indentation will break unless libyaml accepts that patch...
I inherited this project. The patch was not proposed upstream. I'm doing diffs now to determine the scope of the patch. The secondary investigation is what compile flags exist and...
I think this is difference. ``` --- libyaml/src/api.c 2022-02-09 13:06:31.373103740 -0600 +++ yaml/src/api.c 2022-02-09 13:28:42.162132786 -0600 @@ -541,6 +541,18 @@ } /* + * Set whether or not to indent...
I submitted the modifications as a pull request to the libyaml project. They had some outstanding tickets the pull request would solve. There's hope these two can be brought to...
One divergence in behavior between a system and the modified one in this package, now has a test case and an isolated patch with Issue #114
Pull requests were rejected. I cannot use the system library and get the expected behavior. I tried changed these things to the default of the library and the `data.table` project...
Current branch passes val-grind tests.