sp-1234

@robbmcleod but it defeats the purpose of using numexpr(avoiding intermediate array copies)? or `numexpr.evaluate( 'a*a' )` is not a copy but just a "view" over `a`?

Looking into source files is not needed at all. And it can even cause all kinds of problems when doing it without full-blown code parsing. Reflection can do everything that's...

@ysimonson what the hell is `apple+backtick`? upd: by guessing and finding it in menu (View->Show Console) I found that it's Ctrl+backtick

@ysimonson that's fine, but don't expect everyone else to understand it, because it's nowhere labeled as "apple key"

@TakahikoKawasaki So did you think about it since that day? 😉 AFAIK these lines > // It won't happen unless the programmer dare call > // open() and disconnect() in...

https://blog.chromium.org/2009/07/smaller-is-faster-and-safer-too.html https://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/software-updates-courgette tl;dr original chromium uses updates in form of binary diffs and they are very size-efficient Probably if these diffs are generated and uploaded to "Github releases" too, they...

> Are there any issues with 1.1.0 that are show stoppers for you? Not like a real showstopper (because the ring buffer implementation can be replaced after all) but I...

I want to vote for this. For some people (including me), this kind of flickering makes it impossible to look at the screen, I get eye strain almost immediately, and...

maybe something like public letter to Samsung would be a reasonable first step?

>turning down the brightness reduces the effect to manageable levels Nope, it doesn't reduce flickering, this is not even close to a solution.