Angus Griffith

While concerning, this makes sense. We have to allocate a whole lot of `Integer` objects. I think a partial solution to this is packed arrays. I did some testing and...

Or maybe even trying to use `__slots__`: http://tech.oyster.com/save-ram-with-python-slots/

Also, on my system things aren't quite as bad (using #560): ``` In[1]:= ByteCount[Range[1000000]] Out[1]= 297396384 ```

We could implement this using `Riffle` and `StringJoin`. For example: (there are many cases this is just the simplest) ``` mathematica In[1]:= StringRiffle[x_List] := StringJoin[Riffle[x, " "]] In[2]:= StringRiffle[{"a", "b",...

@mrshu, yes I think so. I'm not completely sure what will be required to get this working cross-platform, but if you use the `subprocess` module it should be okay. As...

- Seeing as this functionality isn't really related to what's currently implemented, I'd say it makes sense to put this into a new file. Perhaps `mathics/builtin/command.py` or mathics/builtin/external.py`. - Yes,...

Recently made some progress towards this:  Note the missing plot axes (not affecting in chrome) - see below. Previously the svg was generated incompletely on the backend and then...

@jaycech3n this is the context of the computational geometry problem I was telling you about

Evaluation is already wrapped, not sure why this isn't working. Possible Jupyter bug.