sliptonic
sliptonic
Smaller PRs are better but big ones happen and it's fine as long as the pr is still focused. I don't really care if commits are grouped (typos and fstrings)....
That's a good point and, no, I have not tested with the dressups. This seems too good to be true so I've held off merging it even though it's small....
Thanks. I'll pull the PR. Interesting ideas. I think, for now, I'd like to keep the kerf expansion as simple as possible - one additional property though I'm still not...
Here's a start on a possible hierarchy. We can debate the names for the sections and tabs. I think the first group should be the high traffic stuff where users...
> Additionally to the stuff proposed here IMO it would be a good idea to move the Tools->Customize stuff into the settings dialog, or at least some of it like...
> IMHO The left pane is confused: > > * The icons only add to the congnitive load and are visually tacky. Should be deleted. > > * The name...
Regarding screenshots: If we're talking about UI/UX concepts, they should be fine and are helpful. In that case screenshots of Gimp would be just as valid as screenshots of F*360....
Regarding the indented list: It's very economical and lends itself to translation. I mentioned on the forum that I (personally) like the icons, especially because the contents of the list...
Per @mlampert's comment, this should be fixed in liblathe. I will close this PR in a few days unless I hear back.
closing per discussion