Steve Kobes (Chromium)
Steve Kobes (Chromium)
Oops my "clearer statement" is also wrong. * The ICB is sized to match the visual viewport at pinch-zoom scale == 1.0 ^ this is only true when the meta...
I made a draft of a doc that tries to explain all of this: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FoAGu2grMAnUDgEfLAvALsdDTekstpxb-eeGUhCYTUk/edit I'll try to make some PRs to update the explainers in this repo.
(For discussion) it's still unclear to me exactly what we mean / want with stuff like "Scroll Down: LVP can grow, due to UA UI retracting (if any)" Does it...
Having an upper bound is a good idea. We actually do limit the CLS score to 10.0 when we report it to UKM (data source for the Chrome User Experience...
I think it is better that we don't report a layout shift for outline and shadow changes. We used to do this, but it often fired on pages with hover...
Ah I see, thanks for clarifying. This proposal sounds good to me.
Chrome recomputes weighting factor on every frame. Agree an example would help here.
Generally speaking, if a descendant is visible, it will be fully enclosed by its ancestor. Therefore, if ancestor and descendant shift together, there is no additional contribution to the impact...
I agree with the observation that users care more about "critical content" like headlines and hero images. I expect we will learn a lot from LCP about how to identify...
This seems like a good idea. It isn't currently spec'ed that way but it shouldn't be too difficult to fix.