Sergio Afonso
Sergio Afonso
That's a good point, using another name to avoid conflicts during the transition, if we follow this approach, makes sense.
Features in this PR already landed via merge from main.
Perhaps I didn't explain myself very well initially. What I tried to get to is that there are two ways in which we will find these kinds of issues: -...
PR stack: - #178 - #179 - #180
Ping! Can someone take a look at this and let me know if we're ok with making the transition to the community-approved approach? This PR stack is currently in the...
Thank you Michael, nice to see this moving forward! Could you split this PR, to make it more accessible to review? Maybe one PR for generic MLIR infrastructure additions, one...
> Question for reviewers who have worked on this before - the current behaviour is fairly inconsistent, that is to say, using "simd reduction" on its own results in a...
> Currently not supported clauses are reduction, if, linear, nontemporal and order based on my testing. Of those, with the change I just pushed, both `if` and `reduction` are ignored...
> The current behaviour is that if we have simd with one of those clauses in a composite construct, then simd gets ignored along with the clauses. Are you saying...
PR stack: - #178 - #179 - #180