sh-at-cs

The PR for adding Python 3.12 support is https://github.com/ets-labs/python-dependency-injector/pull/765

I don't think just saying "MIT" in `pyproject.toml` is very watertight, legally speaking... A full `LICENSE` file would be better for potential users of this library.

Yeah, nested mappings are the major issue with this. But I think it looks similar to your last snippet in popular mapping libraries for other languages, [e.g. in Java's MapStruct...

Yeah this is the least important of the batch of issues I raised, I just thought it might make things less confusing for people who are mapping between classes with...

> Having a readiness probe on the main container then makes redundant the readiness probe on the to the proxy sidecar. Just to add one more thought (after I ran...

I'm curious how/why setting `app.container` actually makes things work - is this an internal (hence untyped) attribute of FastAPI that we are setting to make FastAPI use our own dependency...

Thanks for the workarounds in this issue! It's kind of strange that NewRelic's officially supported configurations (as listed [here](https://docs.newrelic.com/docs/logs/logs-context/configure-logs-context-python/#automatic)) are - automatic log formatting & automatic log forwarding, - automatic...

What is the currently recommended way to work around the lack of this feature in templates? Litestar provides [`url_for`](https://docs.litestar.dev/2/reference/connection.html#litestar.connection.ASGIConnection.url_for) as a [builtin callable within templates](https://docs.litestar.dev/2/usage/templating.html#built-in-callables), but that returns a `str`,...

To save time for anyone else wanting to look into this: The search [is implemented](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt.com/blob/4767740d6b4e4886dc8601b893915d9183ec9753/app/app.vue#L91-L97) using Nuxt UI Pro's **[ContentSearch](https://ui.nuxt.com/components/content-search)** component (you can even observe the same input field lag...

Related: https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-core/issues/4156#issuecomment-2191325984