Michael B. Jones
Michael B. Jones
Given that JWTs and Data Integrity have such mechanisms, I don't think we need to do this in VPs themselves.
For context, in IETF specs, URI is preferred over URL.
For instance, in OAuth [RFC 6749], it's a `redirect_uri`, even though it's obviously dereferenceable.
This sounds to me like it's bleeding over into protocols - which we're not doing - rather than data model.
Supporting multiple subjects seems like a failure to "Keep simple things simple". We should consider removing this unnecessary complexity from the V2 spec.
It's my sense that adding this would make things more - not less - complicated. We should close this on that basis.
We want to test JWK keys because they use a general-purpose, widely deployed industry standard that's used by the DID spec. If people also want to test Multibase, we could...
I also support decoupling credentials from the means used to make them verifiable.
I don't understand `"credentialSubject": {claims}` in Option 3. What is it shorthand for?
I asked Ivan and Wendy about the W3C registries process. The W3C does have a way of designating a spec as being a registry. What it does not have is...