Sebastian Sura
Sebastian Sura
I updated the pr template.
I fixed the conflict.
We should update the sd status message during the wait so we know what is happening.
We should probably write at least one systemtest for this. Nothing major. A simple backup + read state file and check for consistency should be enough.
We agreed to go back to how it was previously: ``` "a b c" ``` will get parsed as `a\nb\nc` again.
@jogoossens The idea is that an incremental that gets upgraded to a differential does not take the same timestamp as a normal differential currently. We want to fix this, so...
Are you still working on this PR as its labeled as draft ?
While this fixes the problem that you cannot start a virtual full job while another normal job is running, this does not fix the reverse: if you have a virtual...
> Hm, not quite sure I follow. From my understanding IgnoreDuplicateJobChecking already goes both ways, no? You are right! > We could perhaps check at this point here https://github.com/bareos/bareos/blob/master/core/src/dird/consolidate.cc#L276 whether...
I would suggest that we check inside `AllowDuplicateJob()` whether there are any other always incremental jobs that "run" on the same client and have the same fileset (`dir_impl->res.client/fileset`).