Sayan Bandyopadhyay
Sayan Bandyopadhyay
``` self.name=pipe.SwitchIngress.forward This is action id 17988458 for table b'drop' This is action id 32848556 for table b'port' table_type=0x800 table_type=0x800 table_type=0x800 self.name=pipe.SwitchIngress.forward_timeout This is action id 32848556 for table b'port'...
This issue came up in the GenericTable discussion and we found out that this issue was present in p4runtime outside GenericTables too
> That's a real issue, and I wished that we had wrapped the `repeated FieldMatch match` field into another Protobuf message. > > Even if one feels that in order...
Somewhat related to https://github.com/p4lang/p4runtime/issues/316 ?
@weiqiand @satish153 Can one of you please check and review as well ?
Just FYI, @abhaysi2 One of you or @vshuper will need to resolve merge conflict on the API enum over here https://github.com/p4lang/tdi/pull/122
Feel free to take it up as long as the same artifacts are installed during make install
@antoninbas Any insight on this ?
I agree with adding a new API instead. This breaks backward compatibility