Sam Westerman
Sam Westerman
Oh lovely, ruby segfault: https://github.com/ruby/rbs/actions/runs/6256735966/job/16988021332?pr=1530
The way ruby does it is it actually creates a new method in the class, but gives it the "UNDEF" visibility. We could try something similar
This logic looks correct! You should draft a PR.
(this requires a few of my other commits to be merged before I finalize this)
Shunt to the back of the backlog?
You're right, that's bizarre. I'll work on that soon
https://github.com/ruby/rbs/pull/1456
> * Resolves https://ptb.discord.com/channels/518658712081268738/1143338778384146574/1252966446221492256 > > > +1 for the good intention, but we should keep the `(Numeric) ->` branch as math operators accept any Numeric that `coerce` appropriately. >...
@nobu Yup! I'll cleanup the rebases when I get home! I was posted this first whilst I worked on the bug issue: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21015; I'm hoping to get it prepped for...
I don't see a problem with adding them in. I've also used them in code before, such as: ```ruby class Logger class