Roie Danino
Roie Danino
Hi @s417-lama @tonycurtis Let me know if this patch solves the issue for you: https://github.com/openucx/ucx/pull/9667
> @roiedanino given that we already mess with the flags enum there, maybe expand the dci pool index to 4 bits instead of adding a separate field? The cons are:...
> I guess the benefit is having a smaller ep struct. Although now we can decrease flags to use `uint8_t` instead of `uint16_t`
> what is the use case and how it is going to be implemented ? I don't thinking just stating "the priorities" is sufficient for QoS definition. ### Use Case...
/azp run UCX PR
/azp run UCX PR
/azp run UCX PR
/azp run UCX PR
/azp run UCX PR
/azp run UCX PR