Bart Rogiers
Bart Rogiers
From the current namespace file, it is obvious we are not really using a consistent approach for naming our S3 classes. We have at least these: `bas`, `bcf`, `bud`, `cbc`,...
Currently we rely on hydroGOF for the model performance evaluation. Weights are however not used there, but they are common enough in groundwater modelling to implement I think. Question is...
Let's create a place to also discuss this. My point of view at the moment is that RMODFLOW should follow ModelMuse conventions as closely as possible. Main argument for that...
Metadata
Currently we have some functionality for metadata in a separate *.prj projection file, possibly containing crs, origin coordinates, start time and grid rotation. Some of these parameters can be part...
The idea has surfaced several times: - RMODFLOW.examples in #6, could also serve as a showcase of real-life models - RMODFLOW.invert in #7 - Testing in #8 could potentially also...
The idea is to have for all packages/files from MODFLOW-2005 based codes the following functions: - `rmf_read_*` for reading, - `rmf_write_*` for writing, - `rmf_create_*` for creating the object from...
Currently `rmf_install()` (**seems to be broken**, and) puts the codes in `C:/WRDAPP`. I would like to revert back to installing in the `system.file(package = "RMODFLOW")` folder to avoid interfering with...
Since the renaming of the {scales} S3 class to "transform", it clashes with e.g. {raylibr}'s S3 class. The `print()` method is defined in both packages, and generates a warning, but...
This should fix #13 as far as I can see ...
Since the renaming of the {scales} S3 class to "transform", it clashes with e.g. {raylibr}'s S3 class. The `print()` method is defined in both packages, and generates a warning, but...