Robert Anderson
Robert Anderson
I checked with Carlos, and he's going to run this question by the LwDITA subcommittee, but `mditamap` seems likely to me.
Technically the key `ggroup` on its own would be a link to the `` element (the root topic), but in 3.0.2 it caused some failures in HTML5 that were just...
(Just happened upon this) I think this is probably the original design, but I don't know that it's the right design. If you build a PDF, the images are not...
Adding the FOP label - this is an issue with import precedence in FOP, the custom code for `` in FOP overrides both the `` and `` processing from the...
I was working on this a year ago but got pulled aside and forgot about it after that. At one point in the past I fixed this (and some similar...
One open question after thinking on this more - would this design apply to *all* parameters that let you skip a processing target? Most of them apply to a DITA...
Interesting ... I wonder if this would always be the case? If a topic is excluded from the TOC, you might still want to create links to that topic, but...
I generally disagree that this is user error ... marking this up with URIs was the only valid way to do it before keys and those documents are still valid...
@jelovirt Thinking about how I'm most likely to use this in our larger environment, I think URIs would be OK as long as it can take the absolute path: `/test/inputone.ditamap...
Removing from 3.6 project board based on discussion at contributor call: https://github.com/dita-ot/dita-ot/wiki/Meeting-minutes-2020-10-01