Richard Macklin

Sprockets 4 is still in beta, but this [requires sprockets 4.x](https://github.com/fnando/babel-schmooze-sprockets/blob/1ca192e1757d813d788a8dcb6257a3d0859f0eec/babel-schmooze-sprockets.gemspec#L20). Can this support 3.x as well?

## What? This PR remove some code-comment examples that suggest getting type of a PDF field via `field.constructor.name`. ## Why? It is not safe/stable to rely on `.constructor.name` in general...

DeprecationToolkit currently can't catch deprecations that are generated before tests are executed

3

Consider this example of a deprecation warning: https://github.com/thoughtbot/shoulda-matchers/blob/94b28e4ef4cc001b1c0b4386143b8c05ac163550/lib/shoulda/matchers/warn.rb#L20-L25 A test like this would trigger that deprecation: ```rb class FooModelTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase should define_enum_for(:status).with([:pending, :completed, :failed]) end ``` Here's what gets...

Gzip support for static files

1

Hi, I see that static file support (https://github.com/puma/puma-dev/issues/44) was added in https://github.com/puma/puma-dev/commit/49fdcf3403d90fbac7e4a238d22c678df4c275a4 https://github.com/puma/puma-dev/blob/c5e86b4ab305506245f84b0c51bd1783ca33917a/README.md#L168-L170 This works well, but I noticed that it doesn't seem to serve the gzipped version of static...

For example, ``` ruby class Thing < AePageObjects::Element #... private element :foo end ``` should define `foo` as a private method.

"Try it out online" link 404s

1

[This link](https://github.com/rainforestapp/decaf/blame/3e09de4903f89520a88844170540bb2335bc1812/readme.md#L5) (http://www.goodafternoon.co/decaf/) is a 404

Express v5 blockers

30

_I started writing this as a reply to https://github.com/expressjs/express/issues/4920#issuecomment-1575599117 but the issue was locked just before I finishing typing my comment._ @dougwilson Thanks for your continued work on express. I'm...

It seems that the usage of this dependency was removed in https://github.com/ankit/stylebot/commit/b7d2708110efc2177e1ae2fd0312109194d92714#diff-1fb26bc12ac780c7ad7325730ed09fc4c2c3d757c276c3dacc44bfe20faf166fL62-L64, so we don't actually need it. Furthermore, even though it doesn't appear to be used anywhere else, just...

This processor only applies to CSS assets, so this name makes that clearer, and also has more symmetry with [`Propshaft::Compilers::CssAssetUrls`][1] [1]: https://github.com/rails/propshaft/blob/9ca9fcfc415bdd3d49a2a9d809ca7859a95ec1f9/lib/propshaft/compilers/css_asset_urls.rb#L4

Addresses https://github.com/nvim-lua/kickstart.nvim/pull/982#discussion_r1641975175 This example wasn't using `'` so this makes more sense