Ralph Castain
Ralph Castain
Yes it is - I have fixed it in https://github.com/openpmix/openpmix/pull/2628 and https://github.com/openpmix/prrte/pull/1380. Will backport those to their respective release branches when done.
Someone is welcome to come up with a patch 😄
Almost certainly in PRRTE as well, I should think
@ggouaillardet I believe this should be closed, yes?
The man page is indeed out-of-date - not sure if/when it will be updated. A quick check of the code doesn't find any "ordered" option, although the mapper code does...
Actually, I have to correct myself - there is an "ordered" option and it should be working correctly. I'll check the translation and operation here in a bit as part...
I have this properly working now in my branch and will be opening a PR to bring it into PRRTE's master branch tomorrow. However, the options have changed. The `pe-list`...
@awlauria I have updated PRRTE v3.0 branch with yesterday's fixes fixes from the master branch, if you want to update this before merging.
I'm not entirely sure I understand what you are trying to do, but if you want say four procs on each node, all bound to the first socket on that...
Another option for you: if you want to have the job mapped such that all procs land on the first socket of every node until those sockets are completely filled,...