Bob Deen

Oddly, I reran the same thing on a different machine today (pdsimg-int1) and did not have the same errors. So I don't know if it has something to do with...

Certainly 3 would eliminate most if not all transient errors. If It still fails after that it's probably a hard failure.

@al-niessner actually the 3.5 example fails as I initially reported. The issue is that the validation for collection_type is in the PDS core sch. So when validate is run with...

I think there are two ways to go: merge with local overriding, or just warn for missing ones. Probably merge is easier for end users as long as you pull...

Hmmm... well, is it "critical"? Here's the scenario, you decide. The VGR LDD only just got released. Until release happens, you have no choice but to use local dictionaries. I...

oh interesting... the mapping of "img:" to "http://pds.nasa.gov/pds4/img/v1" is actually in the product label, not the schema. I guess in principle that means a product label could map a LDD...

Okay so further investigation... something is wrong with the 1M00 schematron. If I use it alone (even renamed to 1G to match the others), I get the above error. So...

The 800 vs 1600 thing is because the error only exists in the images, not the browses. So 800 warnings its the appropriate number.

It's pdsimg-int1 which is an old machine and there are other things running on it, so that might explain some of it. Have you explored multithreading for this case? Could...

wow in this day and age? :-O Prob not worth the trouble then to read all the xml's in one thread and do processing in another. I'm surprised there's not...