Pixelcode

Here's how the For Good Eyes Only Licence [defines](https://forgoodeyesonly.codeberg.page/v0.2/#state-surveillance) state surveillance: > State surveillance includes the collection, accumulation, storage, processing, analysis or transfer of personal data or any other –...

I don't think the UDHR's “arbitrary interference” clause is sufficient, since e.g. NSA argue that state surveillance is “required for national security”, as you have already said. I completely understand...

Yeah, war crimes _might_ already be covered, but is there any good reason not to add an explicit clause? I mean: There are good reasons why both the UDHR and...

Let's say there's a war between two countries. If the Rome Statute didn't exist, both parties could argue that, for whatever reason (self-defence, “de-nazification” etc.), their fighting in the war...

> a scenario where a state is using software covered under this license, the state is committing war crimes, and that state hasn't already tripped one of the other protections...

>the only other candidate that I know of would be @realpixelcode, which I don't know if they(?) would be up for maintaining a version of the licence. The thing is,...

> Just read it. Very concise and digestible. Now I bet the core team is going to probably ask on how to integrate it into the main license for ease...

In principle, I find that a good idea, I'm just wondering how you would do that? A script would most likely not be sufficiently "intelligent" enough to generate a summary...

Ok, go ahead then, I guess 😊

> Sorry for the late response. I thought I responded earlier. No worries, mate :) Aren't we multiple time zones apart anyway? 😄 Also, others take much longer. 🤷