rduerr
rduerr
So is this an unsolvable impasse? We really do need to scope what SWEET is supposed to be, since there are a lot of harmonization activities going on.
I don't think AGI has a broad enough scope to do all of SWEET. The cryospheric questions we've already looked at demonstrate that at least! I don't know that Wikidata...
What about definitions for terms that are defined in other ontologies (notably ENVO)?There are many ENVO terms that now use the GCW terminology definitions (though that document isn’t published yet)....
OK, so for the developer question, I do think ENVO's micro-citation is useful. In other words, if I make a change to a term (any change) I annotate the change...
@pbuttigieg @cmungall Your take on this?
Well I think SWEET is now in the public domain - so would a public domain mark from the Creative Commons do?
@lewismc Why not? If SWEET is going to be heavily used it should have one or the other (CC0 or PDM).
And this is why having real "best practices" for ontology development is a good idea. If only some such agreement had been reached 8 months ago, I could have followed...
OK, I received a rdf copy that perhaps I can share (which can be loaded into Protege) but I'll want to ask before I do so...
OK, I'll ask that question too!