Rakina Zata Amni
Rakina Zata Amni
Thanks! Yeah it's quite unfortunate. Also, when trying to update the spec, I found out that the [adopting steps](https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-node-adopt-ext) passes `node` and `oldDocument` but not the new document (the document...
> This sounds like a reasonable proposal to me! It will definitely fix the potential footgun of moving nodes to a template and back. Does the solution here avoid the...
> Chromium reporter here. I just wondering what the timeline looks like on this fix? I was going to spend some time putting the workaround in, but it looks like...
> I don't think this specification should be defining adopting steps for `ShadowRoot`. That should be directly done in the DOM Standard. Per class only one specification gets to define...
> So to be clear the proposal is to only allow adopts from a document's own template-owner document right? Not between arbitrary template/document pairs. Yep, exactly! It is quite an...
cc @tabatkins @emilio
Thanks for looking into this! > The spec should be updated that the stylesheets will be used, but will not appear in styleSheets. I am not sure how to specify...
Is this just for moving this repo from WICG to CSSWG, or does this include merging the specs too? For the latter there's https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3433 too
I think @mfreed7 and/or @emilio are looking into this?
How do we define that? Just add "in no-quirks mode" to the end of "Parse a stylesheet from text"?