Reg Braithwaite
Reg Braithwaite
@Jeff-Mott-OR: With respect to your argument that YDKJS is wrong to claim that JavaScript only has “fake classes,” and that smart people disagree with the book, I wish to disagree...
I was being sarcastic. Somewhat. `YouAreDaChef` "greenspuns" fairly sophisticated aspect-oriented programming into JavaScript, but in doing so, it kind of "takes over" the way you use prototypes and method definitions....
Bake `functionalize` into underscore’s built-in methods that take a function, such that `_.pluck('foo')` and `_.map('foo')` become synonyms.
> it may be beneficial to have some way to differentiate the term "decorator"s as a subset of combinator functions, taking a single function as input, from the design pattern...
Something like that. If we have a very simple curry that works with functions taking two arguments: ``` curry = (fn) -> (x) -> (y) -> fn(x, y) ``` `uncurry`...
This pull request is quite simple, but there are larger forces in play. As written, `.K` and `.T` turn functions into methods. And by function, I mean something that operates...
Fixed elsewhere
be sure to include links to iterators essays
Hello everyone! I did most of the work on the differ, but I did so as an employee of GitHub and don’t own it. The basic principles are easy enough...
Looks like we'll need a web proxy or something unusual built into the Webkit container