Rafi Khan
Rafi Khan
@ScottPierce - Thanks for pointing out that the top level readme does not mention Firestore. That's a miss on our side and I filed an internal bug for it [b/190075287](b/190075287)....
The overly simplified answer is that it made it easier to target multiple platforms with a single codebase. We've only tested it on the platforms where we've had developer demand...
@ttgil - We monitor a **lot** of channels, look at metrics, and speak with customers directly on an ongoing basis. One of the many formal channels we look at is...
> I don't see a voting mechanism here. You can press the smiley face on the upper right hand corner of the first (or any relevant) comment in the thread...
The intention behind a check like this is to help the developer not use an impossible selector on the DOM. If it’s removed you lose that safety net. CSS selectors...
Another solution is to make "strict checking" an option on select that defaults to `false`?
I'm not the right decision maker for this. It should come from someone that uses the library more. That said, I still have the same opinion as before :) On...
The person that used it cares. So maybe drop it? On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 12:25 PM Remco Janssen ***@***.***> wrote: > Same opinion; it doesn't make sense that...
A try/catch isn't ideal but you can be selective about it. You can do that for just the reflect error and re-throw if it's something else. That way you aren't...