Janeczko Jakub
Janeczko Jakub
I think it should be implemented as ```c typedef void(*fn_ptr)(); fn_ptr getProcAddress( void *context, const char *name ); ``` It would hide function definitions in headers and allow for extending...
There is some things I do not know where to implement: - interaction of robustness and index buffer (size is not VK_WHOLE_SIZE): - mesh viewer should show index=0 if robustness...
I have finished all parts of this extension, so this PR is ready for review.
It looks like setting PointSize to 1.0f where I tried doesn't work... IDK how to do it
I would like it merged even if partially.
Default 1.0f for PointSize now works (everything is implemented).
Yes, those were some code style changes. Sorry for the confusion.
> There's no handling of the new structures defined in the extension, the standard features struct but also the new extended usage and pipeline create flags structs which must be...
my bad. I forgot to uncomment the extension string, but it was still passing the features struct to create device. Now I have added it to whitelisted extensions.
I have since tested this PR and found one problem with it (I am not sure how should I fix those): https://github.com/qbojj/vk_khr_maintenance5_test/tree/master When `robustBufferAccess2` is enabled and index is used...