Liang
Liang
https://github.com/ChainAgnostic/namespaces/pull/25 @bumblefudge something like this? Or do I need to open a PR in /CAIPs repo?
@antoineherzog agree that we could consider using "spl-token" as the namespace here. Just tht `spl-token-mint` might be more explicit. But mint address can be used to identify the asset type...
@antoineherzog @bumblefudge actually `spl-token` is better since it's also shorter. let's go with `solana:4sGjMW1sUnHzSxGspuhpqLDx6wiyjNtZ/spl-token:EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v`
@antoineherzog how about just `token` because in CAIP-19 draft: ``` The method specific identifier is simply a [CAIP-19 Asset ID](https://github.com/ChainAgnostic/CAIPs/blob/master/CAIPs/caip-19.md) where all / characters are replaced by _, in order...
sorry.. but was there a new review? https://github.com/golang/groupcache/pull/81#pullrequestreview-32262402 didn't show anything
@bradfitz any other parts I could improve on this diff ?
https://github.com/ChainAgnostic/namespaces/pull/25 is merged. So this is resolved.
Just want to add some context here https://forum.ceramic.network/t/devtools-composite-frommodels-does-not-support-filter/1304