Results 14 comments of Phil Steitz

I think adding these calls would be a bad idea. The spec is vague and at least some implementations do things that DBCP already does in activation/passivation and may cause...

Thanks for weighing in, Bernd. Do you by chance have some links to what drivers are actually doing here? I looked at Postgres and Mysql and could not find any...

Please explain the rationale for these changes. Before considering applying, we need a) what the actual problem is b) test case illustrating it. As Gary points out, one of the...

SecureRandoms take a lot longer to initialize, which will slow down the loading of this class, which may impact performance for users who don't care about cryptographic security of the...

I would expect the number of users who want / need cryptographic security to be tiny. So why make that the default behavior? I have not benchmarked recent JDKs, but...

How is that, @garydgregory? Doesn't getInstanceStrong initialize the instance? I thought it blocked waiting for /dev/random. Blocking in class initialization could be problematic. Or am I misreading the code or...

We used to have a mailing list where we discussed changes like this. Sorry for the snarky comment, but this is a good discussion that will be hard to follow...

On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 4:13 PM Fabrice Benhamouda ***@***.***> wrote: > Thanks @psteitz ! I am not sure where is the > best place to post the following...

To help with tracing, could you provide the versions of both Jedis and Commons Pool that you are using?

Many thanks for the test and analysis. I will look at this in the next couple of days too. The test looks interesting as it is doing something that is...