Josiah Kaviani comments

Results 105 comments of


                                            Josiah Kaviani

workaround to avoid checking types on dependencies?

Good evening, Could you provide full code example which cause en error with library you mention? I would try to figure out how to fix it. Best regards, Artem.

workaround to avoid checking types on dependencies?

Good morning, I did some initial testing for `lazy_object_proxy` library. Generally, I'm interested in support of such libraries. What I have at that time: ```pycon >>> from dependencies import Injector...

workaround to avoid checking types on dependencies?

Speaking about early instantiation, I could confirm it :cry: ```pycon >>> from lazy_object_proxy import Proxy >>> from dependencies import Injector >>> class Inner: ... def __init__(self, x): ... print('x', x)...

workaround to avoid checking types on dependencies?

Indeed, `Proxy(Injector())` could be used only to wrap main injector. This solution does not work with nested Injectors. I just tried to reproduce example you provide: ```python from dependencies import...

workaround to avoid checking types on dependencies?

Quick suggestion: try both `ipython` and `python -i` consoles. It could introduce additional magic.

workaround to avoid checking types on dependencies?

That's because I'm an idiot. My system has python 3.10 by default, most recent dependencies release specified 3.9 as supported, so `pip` decided to install `3.0.0` version as most compatible.

workaround to avoid checking types on dependencies?

Sorry it takes me too long to get back to this issue. I could confirm `Proxy` object does eager initialization in the example I post previously. ```pycon >>> from dependencies...

workaround to avoid checking types on dependencies?

I found the way to workaround `isinstance` check you mention it the very first message. ```python from dependencies import Injector, value from lazy_object_proxy import Proxy as _Proxy class Inner: def...

Simpler deep dependencies replacement.

API above was heavily influenced by [immer javascript library](https://github.com/immerjs/immer). As alternative I would like to suggest a "deep merge" operator for two Injector subclasses. It should be close to existed...

Support keyword only and position only arguments.

Positional-only arguments were added in python 3.8. At the moment we support Python 3.7 and PyPy 3.6. I don't want to introduce additional complexity to the build system to deal...